Code Review Standards
Code Review Standards¶
Summary¶
Establish a common set of guidelines for code reviews across all UL Engineering teams. This ensures that pull requests are evaluated consistently and meet quality, security, and maintainability standards.
What Good Looks Like¶
- Teams use a unified checklist for reviewing PRs
- Review process includes functional, security, and test coverage checks
- PRs are traceable to acceptance criteria in ADO
- Code review feedback is constructive and recorded
Examples or Templates¶
Common Mistakes to Avoid¶
- Reviewing only for formatting or syntax
- Ignoring test coverage or hardcoded secrets
- Skipping reviews entirely under time pressure